Important to ensure maximum efficiency of judiciary after the earthquake and during the pandemic
As a result of coronavirus pandemic and the devastating earthquake that struck Zagreb in March, work of many institutions, including within the judiciary, has been significantly hindered. Since an effective judiciary is an important rule of law and human rights protection mechanism, it is necessary to ensure its maximum efficiency even in these circumstances.
For instance, as only urgent matters are being performed, it is likely that there will be an increase in the number of cases in which the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution and penalties’ execution will occur. It is also necessary to develop a solution for the problem of those who will not be able to use suspensive legal remedies in a timely manner, such as an appeal against judgements, decisions, etc. This also refers to the expiring preclusive deadlines for private lawsuits or other legal actions, which may occur due to restrictions on the freedom of movement.
On the other hand, it is positive that during the pandemic all enforcement proceedings, including those over monetary assets, salaries, pensions and other steady incomes, as well as evictions, are being postponed, which will certainly help citizens of lower social-economic status, including many who lost their jobs in the recent weeks.
Finally, as one of the preconditions for exercising the right to equal access to justice, a fair trial and an efficient legal remedy for many citizens, it is important to ensure that free legal aid, especially receiving and resolving applications for secondary free legal aid and appeals, remains available in a timely manner.
- Artisans Over 65 Forced to Finance Their Own Sick Leave
- Discrimination Based on Political Belief Not Allowed
- Underreporting and Lack of Data Undermine Efforts to Combat Islamophobia in Europe
- New Hate Crime Protocol: Opportunity for More Efficient Detection and Processing
- Speaking Up Against Sexual Harassment: Eye-Opening for the General Public, Encouraging for the Victims
- Does the Use of AI in the Health Sector Present Specific Discrimination Risks?